Testimonial — a proven IT consultant

Jason is a proven IT consultant and has been a pleasure to work with over the last few months.

When we were partnering to find his next position, Jason was always very committed. He was extremely easy to work with, was always open to making strategic changes to his resume, and most importantly, was always available to talk.

Thank you Jason!

—Robert Peterson, Account Manager

British Columbia Institute of Technology

Role: Technical Writing Instructor/Instructional Designer (2007–present)

Need: BCIT’s Department of Communications relies on instructors with industry expertise and still active in the field, so it was my 15 years of experience as a technical writer that brought me into their technical writing courses. In addition, while there I also attained the Provincial Instructional Design Diploma in Adult Education designation to ensure my teaching ability is the best possible.


Classroom experience as core instructor for the Technical Writing Certification Program.

  • Employing learning objectives and ADDIE model to develop courseware.
  • Analysing learner needs, designing lesson plans, developing learning assessments and evaluation tools according to criteria and rubrics.
  • Implementing blended learning (instructor-led training (ILT) and computer-based training (CBT)), and evaluating effectiveness of learning against learning objectives and

Courses taught: Technical Writing Style, Technical Editing and Grammar, Writing for the Web, Business Communications.

Tools used:

  • Learning Hub (online learning management system)
  • Moodle
  • WordPress
  • Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint…)
  • Wiki
  • Adobe Acrobat

Read testimonials about this position…


Role: Adult Education Consultant (2009) and Technical Writer (2018)

Need: WorkSafeBC (the Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia) needed to modernize the way it processed its claims. As an agency mandated to reduce workplace injury and illness, the new system needed to allow WorkSafeBC employees with the ability to use create and follow the progress of claims from admission to release (including all communications regarding workers, employers, and health care providers).

Solution: Working out of the Richmond, BC Head Office, I was brought in (2009) to write training manuals for the enormous roll-out of the system. Training modules included procedures for processing worker injuries, long-term disability, healthcare, wage loss, employee/employer entitlements, and more.

I coordinated with subject matter experts and ran procedures within the CMS (Claims Management System) system. The resulting manuals were used for a province-wide software roll-out.

In 2018 after nearly ten years, I returned to update technical and training materials for the new upgrade. To do this, I re-ran procedures (from 2009) and revised them according to changes in the new version of CMS. To ensure consistency across more than 800 documents, I also developed a style guide.

Tools used:

  • Claims Management System (an in-house managed IBM/Cúram Social Program Management enterprise module-based platform)
  • Microsoft Office (Word, Excel…)
  • TechSmith Snaggit (a screen capture and screen recorder tool to create and edit images and screen captures)
  • SharePoint (a Microsoft enterprise file-management tool)
  • Adobe Acrobat

Read testimonials about this position…

5 Questions Every Technical Writer Needs to Ask

One of the best skills a technical writer can bring to a company is the ability to ask good questions. When a technical writer shows up at your firm, he should be inquisitive and eager to learn about your content. Starting with the same kit of questions a journalist uses (what, who, why, where, when, how) the technical writer works with subject matter experts to ferret out the information the end user needs.

1. What is it?


Despite claims to the contrary, not knowing the particulars about a thing can put a technical writer at a distinct advantage. Why? It’s about empathy—about 75% of the time, technical writers are writing for people who share their initial ignorance, so they ask the best questions.

Subject matter experts, by contrast, may suffer knowledge blindness, a form of ennui brought on by over-exposure to the content. Experts have been so exposed to the difficulties of the subject matter, they can hardly remember how hard it was for them to learn it. As a result, assumptions are made, steps are skipped, and conclusions are drawn that seem premature to the reader.

A good technical writer exposes these oversights and writes with the fresh perspective of the reader who is new to the content.

Questions to ask:

  • What is it?
  • What is it used for?
  • What problem does it solve?

2. Who is it for?

Know Your Audience

Technical documents fail not so much because of poor content but because of poor audience assessment. As you can imagine, a software guide that patiently explains what a computer is to an audience of programmers is going to miss the mark—by a long shot! It’s about finding the Goldilocks zone of information—not too basic, not too complex, just right.

I took a PHP programming course in which the instructor got up one morning and launched into 45-minute lesson on how to use “regex”. I couldn’t follow him at all until my thirst for context finally overcame my patience and I blurted out “Where would you use regex?” To which he replied, “Everywhere?” That was clearly no help to me, so I opted for the reductio ad absurdum argument and said “Like on salad?”

This was likely the instructor’s first glimmer that perhaps I was in the wrong class, and this also coincided with him assuming a more condescending tone with me until the end of the term. He was otherwise a good instructor but made the blunder of forgetting that his audience was more novice (in my case, infinitely more) than he.

Armed with a good working knowledge of the audience for technical content, the writer can provide that needed context. Sometimes, it’s good to risk stating the obvious (that is, provide context even when it’s not necessary) as it provides reassurance or confirmation to all readers.

Part and parcel of knowing your audience is making informed choices about what sort of writing style you should use. If your audience is less educated, for example, prefer a simple direct writing style; whereas, if your audience comes from an academic environment, write in a more formal manner.

Some governmental organizations can tolerate a large amount of passive voice and nominalization (turning verbs into nouns), which other readers would find confusing or even condescending. Which brings me to tone (the other side of style). Tone is your attitude to the reader (or the subject matter). Whether collegial or more reserved, the tone for a document is developed from asking the right sorts of questions about the audience.

Questions to ask:

  • Who is the primary audience for this document?
  • Are there any secondary audiences?
  • What is education level of your audience?

3. Why does your audience need to know?


Where context allows a reader to know the relevance of the content to something already known, purpose allows the reader to know what will be possible as a result of learning this new information.

Going in, very often, the reader has expectations of the document or the subject matter. The reader may already know things about the content or even have prejudices about it. If the writer can anticipate and address these expectations up front, the reader’s job becomes much easier.

Knowing this information may also help the writer tailor what might motivate the reader as well as address any resistance to the subject matter. For example, an in-house technical manual for a workplace automation tool may benefit with a disclaimer that this new innovation is not a prelude to the unemployment line for its readers.

Questions to ask:

  • Why should your readers care to know this information?
  • What expectations do the readers have for this document?
  • As a result of reading your document what will readers be able to do?

4. When do they need to know?


Technical content sometimes has a shelf life that goes beyond ensuring it’s up to date. Sometimes, the information is only relevant to the reader at certain point and then not again. Once when I was working on a set of technical specifications, I found myself in a room with two subject matter expects both arguing about the specifications for the product. How could they be arguing? Aren’t specifications objective?

Once the air cleared, I realized it was not a matter of what we needed to say but where the document was positioned in the Sales funnel (a Marketing term). We were at the beginning, so the prospective buyer only needed to know if our product complied with their equipment standards. Later on (and further down the Sales funnel), the reader would need a different set of specifications that explained in more detail the requirements for installation.

I always provide connecting introductions to sections so that the reader knows if a particular section applies (or not). If a section is dependent on what came before, I mention that. Remember, readers don’t necessarily read technical documents in a linear fashion so it’s helpful to recap with connecting text. Also, readers appreciate knowing if a section doesn’t apply so they can skip it and move on.

Questions to ask:

  • At what part in the process/workflow does this apply?
  • What conditions apply?
  • What exceptions occur?

5. What’s the Structure?


Technical documents are not like novels—nobody curls up by the fire with their lapdog and a snifter of brandy to read their favourite technical manual cover to cover. No. Technical documents are only read when there’s a need. As a result, they’re highly structured to allow the reader to jump about as needed.

Creating the structure for a document is called outlining. The outlining stage of writing ensures the document is laid out in a logical and functional way. An outline usually appears as a document skeleton—just a structure, no details. Once approved, the writer fills in the skeleton with paragraph text. Think of a table of contents that precedes a nonfiction book: Major headings of equal value interspersed with sub headings containing subordinate content.

There’s a design element to structure too. Although readers tend to jump and skip around until they find the specific piece of information they need, technical documents are still written in a narrative (or chronological), so good structure (reinforced with heading styles) leads the reader’s eyes to your intended point of focus.

Questions to ask:

  • What’s the logical flow of the information?
  • What are the major components?
  • Where do sub components fit?

Do you have any questions about your documentation needs? Let’s talk.

Testimonial – A most enjoyable class

Thank you again for teaching a most enjoyable class, I feel like I definitely learned numerous useful writing skills. Hopefully I might be in one of your classes in the future.

—Sara, Technical Writing Student, BCIT

First Words: A Children’s Style Guide


From “Children’s Games” by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1560

I was musing today about the peculiarly magical vocabulary of children, and then started recalling some special words from my childhood. I love these words because they represent a lost innocence of language—like a dead language we all experienced first hand but have hidden away for safe-keeping.

Such words are not easy to remember perhaps because most were trampled (in some cases painfully) by sensible adult words. Somewhere along the line, I learnt not to say “lightning bug” anymore because the correct name is “firefly”; same with “shooting star”, it’s “meteor”. But there are also silly words that no adult could have talked us out of, like “pee-pee”, “bumblebee”, “piggyback” and “choo-choo train”, which are special simply because they’re fun to say.

And then there are those golden spoonerisms, mistaken words that sunder the language with unimagined new sounds. Words like “bisghetti” (“spaghetti”), “bolleyvall” (“volleyball”), “varine” (mine for “ravine”), and my younger sister’s tour de force “Principal Lion” (for “Prince Edward Island”).

I tried to find some sort of style guide on children’s words but came up empty handed. A brief search of the Internet revealed itself tiresome and cynical offering none of the magic but only grey pedagogical resources on correcting children’s speech or exploitive photos of salacious spelling errors found in children’s art. “Well son, your innocence would have been lost altogether had we not posted it to the Internet.”

Do you have special words hidden away since childhood? If so, write me and let me know. I would like to gather them into a style guide of children’s words.

Please include the following:

  • The word and its meaning (or your younger self’s interpretation)
  • Your name and city of origin (if submitting on behalf of someone else, please include that person’s name and your relationship).
  • If possible, the known age of the person when this word came into being (an approximate is fine).

View a sample of First Words – A Children’s Style Guide taken from what’s been collected so far.

Lost in Translation: How Poor-Quality Documentation Costs You Money

Lost in Translation: How Poor-Quality Documentation Costs You Money

A number of years ago, the software company where I worked was struggling to keep its translation costs down. One day I drew the connection between our ongoing need for consistent writing and the costs of translation. For example, we would use “record” and “transaction” to mean the same thing (in truth, it described a process of data records becoming financial transactions, but our readers didn’t understand that until they became experts themselves) and this confused not only our English-speaking readers but it created headaches for our translators. Translators typically charge by the word but they also keep lists of common terminology to save them time.

When preparing documents for translation, consider some of these common errors to avoid.

Images may need to be translated

Not only does the text that appears in images need to be translated, but the images themselves may not translate well to a particular region or culture. Translation is after all a form of localization, so check your images carefully and alert your translators to check them too.

When I was preparing a document on snow plows for translation, not only did the vehicle we’d chosen have to be checked for authenticity to the region (do they have snow plows like this there?) but we also had to decide whether to Photoshop a translated version of “snow removal” printed on the vehicle or just erase it (we did erase it in the end).

Corporate branded words and phrases may OR MAY NOT need translation

There are lots of funny rules around how branded words and phrases should be handled when a document is translated. For example, I worked at a company that had trademarked the phrase “telematics for the planet”. But it was only ever trademarked in English, so we had to instruct our translators to let this stand even when used in the flow of a sentence.

Lorsqu’on utilise nos produits, ne soy pas oubliant « Telematics for the Planet™ »…

Translation also needs to be localised

A good translator is on the alert for terminology that is appropriate for the audience. A good translator will also alert you to figures of speech, metaphors, and clichés that don’t translate at all. Keep your technical documents free of such writing and you’ll save money on back-and-forth communications.

What’s worse than the over reliance of metaphors in writing? Why, mixed metaphors of course. Just imagine translating this baby into Spanish, or German, or Russian.

Inflation is a very difficult genie to put back into a bottle so you’re not going to be able to stop on a dime.

Units of measure may need more than just language translation

Units of Measure are also a form of localisation that are frequently overlooked. While our English-language documentation was destined for the American market, we always preferred Units of Measure to be listed in American measures (with metric in parentheses). This detail eluded us when we sent the same documents for translation into French (bound for a Quebec audience) and it came back with all the American measures carefully translated into French even while Quebec (and indeed all of Canada) uses metric measures.


Testimonial – Good jump start

I just wanted to say thanks for being a good teacher. These classes have been great primers for the rest of my education. So thanks for your positive attitude and good jump start.

—Alex, Technical Writing Student, BCIT

Singing The Single-Sourcing Blues

Photo credit: Creative Commons
The following somewhat (but not entirely) fictionalised story commemorates a failed attempt to impart upon a decision-maker the benefits of single-sourcing technical content. 

Installation High

A 30-day free software trial of Madcap’s Flare software seemed like the way to go to get us out of the tired rut of our end-user technical documentation. This product’s offerings of single-sourcing capabilities included content tagging for advanced cross-referencing, sophisticated importing and exporting, team collaboration (with multiple levels of access for reviewers), and most of all, topic-based structuring.

Photo credit: MadCap Software, Inc.

When I met with the decision-making manager, his first question was why I needed 30 days. “Well”, I said as diplomatically as I could, “I don’t expect to be assessing the software 40 hours per week for 30 days. That’s just Madcap’s trial period.”

But that was just his warm-up because he seemed to have other plans in mind. “Before we start looking at new software”, he said, “perhaps we need to step back and assess what our users need.” Normally this would seem like a reasonable suggestion, but to date no interest had yet been shown about user needs, so why now? I suspected a delaying tactic.

Big Data for Small Minds

The manager offered to run some analytics on traffic for our Webhelp and maybe even send out a survey to all users so as to solicit their feedback on the documentation. The manager seemed confident that something would come of engaging our users, although I already knew that we had very little data on usage and that it would be very easy to draw whatever conclusions we wished from analytics. If this is the requirement needed to install a 30-day free trial of software, I thought, why bother?

“Have you thought of using WordPress”, the manager queried. I made a point of not letting my emotions show, but some part of the cheery recommendations I was planning died in that moment. “No”, I said but added quickly, “How would you implement a single-sourcing solution with WordPress?” The manager waned in his enthusiasm a little, so I took the opportunity to explain the problem/solution further.

“We have a large array of documents (user guides, training handouts, change management documents, release notes, and on and on) all of which are maintained in a way that creates great inaccuracies and much wasted time keeping track of revisions and duplicates.”

Magic Bullet Point

By mentioning the problem with duplicates, I thought I’d laid down a trump card of sorts, but the manager took it to mean that I was prey to some form of technical writer magical thinking.

“There is no software that’s going to prevent duplicates”, he said, “People, no matter how great the software, can still create duplicates.”

I had to pause at this. I wasn’t proposing a magic bullet. I knew full well that software has limitations. I needed an example to put him squarely in the seat of what the present system is like and why it isn’t working.

“When you drive down the road, there’s nothing preventing you from swerving your car into oncoming traffic”, I went on, “You can do it, but what’s preventing you is your agreement (coupled with myriad laws and cultural taboos) to play within the rules.”

“Of course, people can still create duplicates, but what we need is a set of tools that point us toward good practices rather than the current system (Word documents stored on people’s C drives) that get copied, and copied, and pasted, and then re-copied across the system in a way that’s prone to error. Then, if there’s a change to be made, who can find all the documents affected and change them?”

Enter Steve Jobs

The manager conceded my point, but then he went off in another direction to question the need for documentation—AT ALL!

“Do you have an iPhone”, he asked.

“Yes”, I replied.

“Did it come with a manual?”

“Well, yes it did”, I confirmed suspecting now where his questions were leading.

“Have you read it?” This was his turn to sound triumphal.

“No, I haven’t”, I said.

“You see!”, he erupted, “You have an iPhone and it has a user manual, but you’ve never read it!” He seemed almost delirious at this portrayal of software so intuitive it didn’t even need a user manual. Clearly, Apple in its magnanimity was providing user guides only as a form of self-effacing humility.

I thought it wise to choose my words carefully, so I paused. And then I said, “It’s true. Since I came to your software company, I have worked on the assumption that we all agree that there is a need for software documentation.”

Then I launched my final salvo.

“When your software is designed to Steve Jobs’s and Apple’s standards—that is, it’s so intuitive no user guide is needed­—I’d welcome the idea of dropping documentation. But I’m working with the system as it is now.”

Testimonial – Your class has taken my writing up a few notches

Thanks for the class. It has taken my writing up a few notches and has given me confidence that I can move from creative to technical writing.

—Verna, Technical Writing Student, BCIT