Focus on 29 July, 2024

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

Role: Technical Writer (2021–present)

Need: In order to reduce the number of rejections of technical documents received from the regulator, I was asked to develop a process for improving and tracking trends across thousands of documents and reducing rejected documents.

Solution:

Initially, developed an overview of all rejected documents which showed the most common errors. Worked with their style guide and numerous templates, and my knowledge of grammar and concise writing to build a standard for documents that could be adhered to. When asked to perform an editorial review of documents, I could produce an accurate and detailed estimate of the time required for completion, which allowed me to quickly review documents to a higher standard, thus increasing the likelihood of acceptance by the regulator.

Tools used:

  • ATOM document management system
  • Visio
  • SharePoint
  • Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint…)

Read testimonials about this position…

Testimonial – Clarity in communicating with internal clients

As the manager directly responsible for overseeing technical writing and business process writing projects at the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, I found Jason’s skills, experience, excellent customer service, and refreshing attitude very gratifying over the last couple of years we’ve been working together. His clarity in communicating with internal clients and quick turnaround of deliverables earned him a respected position within our team. Whether penning helpful posts to improve the quality of writing on a company-wide basis or reviewing and revising large process documents, Jason is always a valuable asset to our team.

CNLAndre (Andy) Séguin, Information Management Program Specialist, Information Management and Process Governance, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

Testimonial – What a thorough and detailed review should look like.

I much appreciate the quality and methodology of your technical-writer services. Each of your reviews have made my documents better and added value. As a technical writer myself for many years, I understand what a thorough and detailed review should look like, and yours exceed that in my opinion. I also appreciate the care you take to avoid introducing errors into the document. Overall, I would say that I’m going to be a better writer in the future based on the lessons I’ve learned from our interactions.

Thank you!

CNL—Herb Marshall, Decommissioning & Environmental Remediation, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories